SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 6058

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on :04.04.2022 Pronounced on : 08.04.2022 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)Nos.9548 to 9550 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.7292, 7295, 7298, 7294, 7297, 7299 and 7300 to 7302 of 2021 P.Vidhu Prabha ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9548 of 2021 M.Dhulasy Brindha ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9549 of 2021 S.Periyar Rani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9550 of 2021 Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. ... Respondents in W.P.(MD)Nos.9458 and 9549 of 2021

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

3.T.Preetha

4.A.Sangeetha 5.C.Poongodi 6.M.Sargunam

7.R.Bharathi

8.E.Deepak Kumar ... Respondents in W.P.(MD)No.9550 of 2021 (R3 to R8 are impleaded vide Court order dated 23.03.2022 in W.M.P.

(MD)No.2524 of 2022 in W.P.(MD)No.9550 of 2021)

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned circular in Ref.No. 035195/E3/1/2021-SPG on the file of the respondent No.2 dated 21.05.2021 and the consequential impugned circular in Ref.No. 035195/E3/1/2021-SPG on the file of the respondent No.2, dated 23.05.2021 and quash the same as illegal insofar as the Department of Psychiatry in the second respondent Directorate is concerned and consequently for a direction, directing the respondents to transfer and post the petitioners in the post of Assistant Professor / Senior Resident / Junior Resident / Tutor in any of the available vacancies in the Department of Psychiatry in the second respondent Directorate before going ahead with the transfer counselling for the Service Post Graduate, who have not at all completed the courses till date.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Aswin Rajasimman, For Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy (in all Writ Petitions)

For R1 and R2 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, Additional Government Pleader.

(In all Writ Petitions)

For R3 to R8 : Mr.M.S.Suresh Kumar (In W.P.(MD)No.9550 of 2021)

COMMON ORDER

The circular issued by the second respondent for on-line counseling (Video Conferencing) for Service Post Graduates for Degree/Diploma candidates and the vacancy details issued in circular dated 23.05.2021, are under challenge in these writ petitions.

2.The petitioners joined M.D Psychiatry in the year 2015 and 2016 respectively and completed the course in the year 2018 and 2019 respectively. They were appointed in the post of Assistant Surgeon and they were working at Government Head Quarters Hospital, Virudhunagar, Government Hospital, Rameshwaram and Government Head Quarters Hospital, Tirupur respectively, under the control of the Directorate of Medical Services. The second respondent issued a circular for transfer counseling for the post of Assistant Professor / Senior Resident / Tutor / Junior Resident in all specialities for the Medical Officers working in DMS/DMS(ESI)/DPH side.

3.The petitioners state that they were participated in the transfer counseling held on 28.02.2021 and chosen the Senior Resident Post and Assistant Professor Post in Department of Psychiatry, Ramanathapuram Government Medical College Hospital, Ramanathapuram and Senior Resident Post in Department of Psychiatry, Krishnagiri Government Medical College Hospital, Krishnagiri, respectively. However, the second respondent has not issued the order of transfer and posting, pursuant to the transfer counseling held on 28.02.2021. While so, the second respondent issued the impugned circular dated 23.05.2021 regarding online counseling (Video conferencing) for Service Post Graduates for Degree/Diploma candidates, who are completing their courses during May 2021. Thus, the petitioners are constrained to move the present writ petitions.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioners mainly contended that the petitioners are serving by executing a bond for two years. Admittedly, they are non-service candidates, working in the medical department. The petitioners have participated in the transfer counseling held on 28.02.2021 and chosen the post of Senior Resident and Assistant Professor in Department of Psychiatry, Ramanathapuram Government Medical College Hospital, Ramanathapuram and Senior Resident in Department of Psychiatry, Krishnagiri Government Medical College Hospital, Krishnagiri respectively. While so, without issuing the order of transfer and posting, the second respondent issued another circular for in-service candidates, thereby affecting the rights of the petitioners for transferring to the post at Ramanathapuram and Krishnagiri.

5.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the official respondents opposed the contentions raised by the petitioners by stating that the impugned circular is no way connected with the petitioners. The circular was issued to in-service candidates, who have executed a bond to serve in the medical department till their retirement. However, the petitioners are the non-service candidates executed a bond for two years and they are not regularly appointed to the post of Assistant Surgeon. Therefore, the service of the petitioners cannot be compared with the in-service candidates, who all are executed a bond to serve in the medical department of the Government of Tamil Nadu, till they attain the age of superannuation. Thus, the very circular is not applicable to the writ petitioners and the counseling conducted to the non-service candidates are no way connected with the in-service candidates.

6.The question arises whether the transfer counseling can be claimed as a matter of absolute right by an employee and further transfer is a condition of service or right of an employee.

7.The constitutional Court across the Country as well as the Apex Court of India has repeatedly held that transfer is an incidental to service, more so, a condition of service. Place or post can never be claimed as a matter of absolute right. The transfer counseling is a facility or concession provided to the employees to choose th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top