SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 25401

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Suriyakumar @ Suryakumar – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.16 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent police.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.16 of 2019. The material portion of the allegation against the petitioner is as follows:

(i)The defacto complainant was residing in Odaipatti with her family. Before one month, a betrothal function was conducted in between one Venkatesh and Ravinarani, who is the niece of the defacto complainant. The accused person is the friend of one Vasanth, who had a one side love affair with Ravinarani. Therefore, Vasanth had an enmity with Ravinarani's family because of non- acceptance of his love. When the betrothal function was conducted in the defacto complainant's house, the alleged accused person had enmity with the defacto complainant and thereby morphed the photo of the defacto complainant, which was taken from her whatsapp display picture and added some bad comment and posted it in face book as if the defacto complainant shared by her own. When the defacto complainant asked about the post to the accused person, he had abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and thereby threatened the def

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top