C O M M O N O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. The plaintiff in O.S.No.360 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Madurai is the revision petitioner in this revision petition. He filed redemption suit. The petitioner filed I.A.Nos.59, 60 and 61 of 2024 for reopening of the suit, recalling himself for examining P.W.1 and seeking permission to mark certain documents. IAs were dismissed vide order dated 25.03.2024. Challenging the same, this civil revision petition came to be filed.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds and called upon this Court to set aside the impugned orders and grant relief as prayed for.

4. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the defendant submitted that the impugned orders are well reasoned and they do not warrant interference.

5. I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record.

6. The revision petitioner wants this Court to mark the death certificate of his father and the police complaint given by the defendant's daughter and few other documents.

7. The petitioner had obtained documents from the jurisdictional police unde