SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20995

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
A.J.Ethiraj – Appellant
Versus
The Government of TamilNadu – Respondent


O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

The lis on hand has been instituted questioning the legal validity of the appointment of the respondents 3 to 18 to the post of Junior Administrative Assistants in the services of the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority. Perusal of the impugned appointment order reveals that in exercise of the powers under Sub-Section (5) of Section 6 and Sub-Section (5) of Section 9 of “The Tamil Nadu Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987” [hereinafter shall be referred to “Act”], read with Sub-Rule 2 Rule 13 of the Tamil Nadu District Legal Services Authorities Rules, 1997, the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice/Patron-in-Chief and the Hon'ble Executive Chairman of the Tamil Nadu Legal Services Authority have ordered provisionally to appoint the respondents 3 to 18 to the post of Junior Administrative Assistant in the existing vacancy in the pay band of Rs.19,500-62,000/- as per Pay Matrix Level-8 with all admissible allowances under the orders and Rules now in force.

2. Section 6(5) of the Act enumerates that “the State Authority may appoint such number of Officers and other employees as may be prescribed by the State Government in consu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top