HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
MRS.S.STELLA – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB-REGISTRAR – Respondent
O R D E R
By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. Challenge has been made to the refusal slip issued by the respondent in RFL/Velachery/47/2024 dated 18.07.2024 refusing to register the sale deed dated 28.04.2023 presented by the petitioner.
3. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that when the sale deed was presented for registration, the respondent refused to register the same on the ground that the original document, patta, house tax receipt, encumbrance certificate and photocopy of GPS were not produced.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
5. This Court in Federal Bank Vs. Sub Registrar and two others in W.P.No.2758 of 2023 dated 08.02.2023, has held as follows : “22. Similarly, the second proviso requires the executant to produce a revenue record to show his “right over the subject property” where the property is ancestral in character and there is no original deed available. Even a tax receipt can be produced under this proviso which is opposed to the fundamental principle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.