SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 9305

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
R.SUBRAMANIAN, G. ARUL MURUGAN, JJ
the secretary to government – Appellant
Versus
mahadevi – Respondent
W.A.No. 385 of 2025



Advocates:
Mr.P.Kumaresan Additional Advocate General, Asst. by Mr.P.Ananda Kumar, Government Advocate; Mr.N.Balasubramanian

The court upheld the validity of the respondent's appointment as Cook, ruling that age limit extensions for Scheduled Castes and educational qualifications were properly applied.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 - Section 20(8) - Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service - Appointment of Cook - Cancellation of appointment on grounds of over-age and false Transfer Certificate quashed - Respondent entitled to age extension as per rules - Writ Court found appointment valid. (Paras 2, 3, 6, 8)

(B) Age Limit - Provisions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Upper age limit for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes is 35 years, extendable to 40 years under specific conditions. (Paras 3, 5)

(C) Educational Qualification - Requirement to read and write Tamil is sufficient for the post of Cook; production of Transfer Certificate not mandatory for disqualification. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The respondent was appointed as Cook on 26.02.2021, but the appointment was cancelled on 19.04.2023 due to claims of being over-aged and producing a false Transfer Certificate. The Writ Court ruled that the respondent was eligible based on age extensions provided in the law.

Findings of Court:
The Writ Court upheld the respondent’s appointment, stating the cancellation was unjustified based on age and educational qualifications.

Issues: The main issues were whether the respondent was over-aged at the time of appointment and whether the Transfer Certificate was genuine.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the age limit could be extended to 40 years for the respondent and that the Transfer Certificate was not a mandatory requirement for appointment.

Result: Writ Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

The State is on appeal against the orders of the writ Court quashing the cancellation of appointment of the respondent in the Writ Appeal, on the ground that the respondent was over aged on the date of appointment and on the ground that the respondent has produced a false Transfer Certificate.

2. The respondent was appointed as Cook in the hostels attached to the Adi-dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department. The appointment order was issued on 26.02.2021. The orders impugned in the Writ Petitions came to be passed on 19.04.2023. The writ Court had found that the respondents were not over aged, on a reading of Rule 5 of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service read with Section 20(8) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 .

3. It is not in dispute that the post to which the respondent was appointed are covered by the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service. For the post of 'Cook' the educational qualification is that a person should be able to read and write Tamil. Rule 5(1) prescribes an age-limit of 30 years on the date of appointment. Proviso to Rule 5(1) grants an additional 5 years to candidates who belong to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes. Therefore, the upper age limit as per the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service is 35 years. Admittedly, the respondent was aged above 35 years on the date of her appointment. Therefore, the order impugned came to be passed cancelling her appointment. The writ Court found that proviso to sub-section (8) of Section 20 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 would apply and there would be an extension of another 5 years for the post to which the respondents had been appointed. The first proviso to sub-section (8) of Section 20 reads as follows:-

Provided that, for direct recruitment to a post included in a service for which the minimum qualification required is not higher than the minimum general educational qualification, the age limit prescribed shall be increased by five years in respect of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or in respect of destitute widows of all castes, who do not possess a general educational qualification, which is higher than the minimum general educational qualification;

4. Rule 5(1) of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service, which deals with 'Age' reads as follows:-

(1) Age: Candidates for appointment by direct recruitment to any of the posts other than those in Classes I and II must not have completed 30 years of age on the date of appointment. Explanation:-

For the purpose of the sub-rule, the age limit, in the case of candidate appointed through Employment Exchange, be reckoned from the date of sponsoring of the candidate by the Employment Exchange concerned for appointment to the post.

Provided that a candidate belonging to the Scheduled Caste or the Scheduled Tribe shall be eligible for appointment to the above classes if he has not completed 35 years of age on the date of appointment.

Provided further that the age limit aforesaid shall not apply to the appointment of Ex-servicemen to any category.

*Provided also that the age limit shall not apply to the appointment made to this service from among the employees borne on the contingent establishment in the same department brought into regular establishment on completion of five years of service.

*(Inserted in G.O.Ms.No.677, P&AR (Per.F)Dept., dt.1.7.85)

Provided also that the age-limit shall not apply to appointment by direct recruitment from among Process Servers and Process Amins of the Revenue Department. Provided also that the age-limit aforesaid shall not apply in the case of appointment of any person transferred from a local fund or municipal institution in consequence of the transfer of such institution to the control of the State Government.

^Provided also that the age-limit aforesaid shall not apply in the case of appointment of Wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top