Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Battu Devanand, J
R.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
The Vice Chancellor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the petitioner's request for promotion and university's inaction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court observed the representation's status and the university's response. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. the necessity of the committee's action due to the absence of the vice chancellor. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. direction for timely consideration of the representation. (Para 7) |
| 5. final disposal of the petition with the directive. (Para 8) |
ORDER
The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Professor at Tamil University as per the order dated 28.03.2018 passed by the first respondent. As per the Probation Rules, the petitioner's probation should have been declared after two (2) years. After completion of two (2) years of service, there was a documentary evidence of unsatisfactory service. However, it was not declared by the respondents. Despite completion of seven (7) years from the date of his appointment, no steps have been taken by the respondents to declare his probation.
2. The petitioner submitted a representation on 21.02.2024, requesting the respondents for the Career Advancement to the Next Cadre. As it was not considered, he made a detailed representation to the respondents on 02.12.2024, re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
