SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19873

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent



The court established the necessity of strict adherence to procedural norms for issuing non-traceable certificates to prevent fraud in relation to lost document claims.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Document Tracing - RC No.2029209/General.1(1)/2022 - The court emphasized on the procedural guidelines established for issuing non-traceable certificates and mandated compliance by the police to prevent misuse and forgery of lost documents.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner lost an original document (Document No.4616/2009) and sought a writ of mandamus to either trace it or issue a non-traceable certificate after no action from the police regarding the representation made.

Finding of the Court:

The court recognized the procedural requirements set forth in a police circular and directed the police to act within eight weeks based on this framework, underlining the need for strict compliance to prevent fraudulent activities.

Issues: Whether the police can deny issuance of a non-traceable certificate and the legitimacy of procedures outlined in the Director General of Police's circular concerning lost original documents.

Ratio Decidendi: The issuance of non-traceable certificates must be governed by well-defined procedures to ensure verification of claims and protect against forgery, with the police bound to comply with the established guidelines.

Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of, directing the police to act per the circular within eight weeks.

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus to take necessary steps to trace the original document (Document No.4616/2009) or to issue a Non-traceable Certificate, by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 21.06.2024.

2. The petitioner claims that on 14.06.2024, he has lost his original document in Doc.No.4616/2009, for which he has submitted a representation before the respondent police on 21.06.2024. However, no action has been taken by the respondents so far. Therefore, the petitioner seeks a certificate that this document is not traceable so that he can get the certified copy from the Registration Department.

3. This issue has already been addressed by the Director General of Police in his Circular memorandum in RC No.2029209/General.1(1)/2022, dated 01.04.2022.

4. The circular was issued pursuant to the direction of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.3307 of 2022. Several writ petitions are filed before this Court seeking direction to the police to issue non-traceable certificates that the original documents are misplaced and it could not be traced. Cases are also filed before this Court that by obtaining non-traceable certificates, certified copies of the said documents are obtained and with those certified copies obtained in the strength of Non-traceable certificates issued by police, forged documents are created. Therefore, this Court has issued directions in the above Crl.OP.No.3307 of 2022 based on which the circular was issued by the Director General of Police stipulating the procedure to be adopted with regard to issuance of non-traceable certificate and the same is extracted as under:

“The following procedure should be adopted with regard to issuance of Non- traceable Certificate on receipt of petition relating to the loss of original land documents:

1.Petition should be preferred only by the legal owner or his power of attorney of the property.

2.The petitioner should furnish the following documents along with the petition:-

(i) 2 Certified copies of the document/s which is alleged to have been lost (obtained within a month prior to the presentation of the petition at the Police Station from the concerned Sub Registrar Office). (ii) Recent photograph of the petitioner or that of his power of attorney.

(iii) Copy of Aadhar Card or Voter ID or Passport (No other Identity proof will be accepted).

(iv) News paper advertisements in original as mentioned in para 6.

(v) Undertakings mentioned in paras 7 and 8.

3.In case of death of the legal owner of the property, his or her legal heir should present the petition along with the following documents.-

a) Death Certificate pertaining to the death of the legal owner issued by the competent Local body/

Municipality/Corporation authorities.

b) Legal Heir Certificate issued by the designated Revenue Authority to establish that the petitioner is the legal heir of the owner of the property.

4.In case of multiple legal heirs, No Objection Certificate obtained from the legal heirs other than the petitioner should be enclosed.

5.Encumbrance certificate (Digital or Manual) for the above property for the last 20 years or from the date of registration of missing document whichever is longer and it should be obtained from the concerned Sub Registrar Office only.

6.Original of the public advertisement given one in leading English and one in leading vernacular newspaper should be enclosed. The advertisement should have been published within

30 days prior to the presentation of the petition.

7.The petitioner should submit an undertaking along with the petition that no civil dispute or mortgage pertaining to the property document alleged to have been lost, is pending before any Court or Financial Institution.

8.The petitioner should also submit an undertaking along with the petition that if he/she furnishes any false information with regard to the property, whose document is alleged to have been lost, the petitioner or whoever abets the offence shall be liable for criminal prosecution u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top