SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37243

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
S.M.Syed Abdul Khader – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar – Respondent


ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned letter dated 24.06.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent and direct the 1st respondent herein to register the Lease deed entered into by the petitioner with M/s.Infiniti Retail Limited.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the subject property was developed under a registered Wakf Deed dated 20.06.1957 having obtained necessary approval from Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority ('CMDA') which property consists of stilt plus four floors, . While being so, the 3rd respondent issued a notice dated 31.08.2017 calling upon the petitioner to register the above said building with the 3rd respondent as the same was developed under Real Estate Regulation and Development Act 106 ('RERA Act') for which, the petitioner sent a reply stating that the petitioner is neither a promoter nor he had sold the above said property and said property was developed from their own funds, which does not come under the purview of the RERA Act.

3. It is the further case of the petitioner that, after completing the construction, the petitioner having obtained a completion certificate from CMDA, had leased out 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top