Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
B. SRIRAMAN – Appellant
Versus
D. SELVAKUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. specific case of the petitioner (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. conclusion regarding evidence (Para 5) |
| 3. conclusion does not suffer (Para 6) |
| 4. main case disposed (Para 7) |
| 5. pending appeal (Para 8) |
| 6. cause of action to prosecute (Para 9) |
| 7. criminal original petition disposed (Para 10) |
ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials placed on record.
4. The above order passed by the learned Magistrate was confirmed in appeal by the Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur in Crl.A. No. 31 of 2016 by order dated 31.07.2018.
6. In view of the above, the conclusion arrived at by both the Courts below does not suffer from any illegality warranting the interference of this Court.
8. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent/complainant submitted that as against the judgment of the Trial Court, the respondent/complainant has filed an appeal and the same is now pending in Crl.A.No.124 of 2023 before the learned I Additional District Court, (PCR), Thanjavur.
10. In the result, this criminal original petition is disposed of in the above terms.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
