SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 42659

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Dr. Justice D. Nagarjun, J
R.Kamatchi – Appellant
Versus
Indian Overseas Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.Ashwin Prasad for Ms.V.Srimathi, Mr.Srinivasamurthy

Table of Content
1. petitioner's husband missing (Para 2)
2. submission by respondent (Para 3)
3. court's directive on family pension (Para 4 , 5)
4. requirement for family pension (Para 7)

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to pay monthly pension to the petitioner from March 2014.

2. The facts in brief as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner are as follows:

2.1. The petitioner's husband was working in the respondent bank as an Assistant Manager and was retired on 31.08.2000, by availing voluntary retirement service scheme. Subsequently, the petitioner's husband V.Rajaram was found missing from January 2014 and so far as his whereabouts of him is not known. The petitioner having waited for him since 2014 has ultimately requested the respondent Bank to grant family pension to her. As there was no response, this writ petition.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that family pension will be paid by following the Indian Overseas Bank (Employees) Pension Regulations 1995. It is further submitted that if an employee expires in order to sanction family pension, an application has to be filed seeking family pension al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top