Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R. POORNIMA, JJ
Pappathi – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. brief case of the prosecution (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. complaint has been marked (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. conducted inquest on the dead body (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. postmortem report (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
J U D G M E N T
This appeal is preferred against the judgement of acquittal passed by the learned Assistant sessions Judge Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul in S.C.No. 149 of 2014 dated 25.01.2018 for the offence under Section 302 IPC.
He is having one son and a daughter by name Jyothi Alias Muniammal, aged about 30 years. 13 years back, she was married to one Nagaraj son of Perumal and she is having a daughter aged about 12 years. His Daughter had conceived.
4. The complainant tried to save his daughter with the help of Papammall, Perumal, but, she succumbed to her injuries. The said Manikandan left his two wheeler bearing registration number TN-57- AD-2647 in the place of occurrence. Hence, he prayed to take action against the said Manikandan.
6. Thiru.Nallu, Inspector of Police P.W.15 after receipt of F.I.R., went to the place of occurrence, prepared observation mahazar, rough sketch, Ex.P4 and Ex. P8 in the presence of witnesses Varadaraj and Savadamuthu. He
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
