HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Pranav Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Government of India – Respondent
O R D E R
The Petitioner is aggrieved by an order passed by the respondent/Government of India (GOI) dated 30.04.2019. The aforesaid order, while rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking Indian Citizenship in terms of Section 8(2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (in short ‘CA’) permits him to apply for Citizenship under Section 5(1)(f)/(g) of the CA, if he so desires.
2. A preliminary question thus arose as to why the petitioner pursues this writ petition, seeing as the impugned order does not reject his claim for citizenship in toto, but leaves an avenue open, whereunder he could still obtain the relief claimed.
3. A perusal of Section 5(1)(f)/(g) of the CA indicates the existence of certain conditions based upon which, such status will be granted. Citizenship sought under the aforesaid provisions would necessitate residence of the petitioner in India for various stipulated periods and it is for this reason that the petitioner expresses no interest in this and would instead pursue his claim under Section 8(2) only, as he believes that he was an Indian Citizen to begin with and thus must be permitted to ‘resume his citizenship’.
4. I agree with the petitioner that his entitlem
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.