Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. Nisha Banu, J
G.karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
G.thirumalaivasan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's ownership established through funds. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. defendants claimed co-ownership without evidence. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. defendants argue settlement deed is invalid. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. plaintiff's evidence disproves defendants' claims. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court affirms plaintiff's ownership and dismisses appeal. (Para 21 , 22 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
J.NISHA BANU, J.
This Appeal suit is filed by the appellants/defendants as against the decreetal of the suit in O.S.No.2080 of 2019 dated 09.12.2022.
2. The respondent herein is the plaintiff and filed a suit in O.S.No.2080 of 2019 on the file of XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, praying for the relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendants to vacate and handover or deliver the vacant possession of the suit properties to the plaintiff without any condition and for the consequential relief of permanent injunction that the defendant should not in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property and cost for the suit.
3. (a) The defendants are the appellants herein. The Plaintiff/respondent filed a suit for the relief of Mandatory injunction as stated
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
