SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20695

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice ANITA SUMANTH
A.R.NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR – Respondent


O R D E R

Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for R1, being the Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk and is represented by Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Additional Advocate General. They are armed with instructions to enable a final disposal of this Writ Petition, even at the stage of admission. No notice is thought necessary to R2 as her interests are duly taken note of and addressed by virtue of this order.

2. The petitioner has challenged a legal heirship certificate issued on

08.02.2024 pursuant to the demise of A.R.Sivaraman, S/o Ramachandran on 08.11.2023. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the brother of the said A.R.Sivaraman, whose wife had pre-deceased the husband without leaving any legal heir or issues.

3. The impugned legal heirship certificate contains the names of Vishnupriya S, as daughter of the decased, Vijaya, Ramachandran and Gomathi, being wife, father and mother of the deceased, who have pre- deceased him. According to the petitioner, the said Vishnupriya, arrayed as R2, is the daughter of one Thiyagarajan and Lalitha, who are stated to be unrelated to the petitioner or deceased A.R.Sivaraman.

4. According to the petitioner, the bi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top