HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice ANITA SUMANTH
A.R.NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR – Respondent
O R D E R
Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for R1, being the Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk and is represented by Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Additional Advocate General. They are armed with instructions to enable a final disposal of this Writ Petition, even at the stage of admission. No notice is thought necessary to R2 as her interests are duly taken note of and addressed by virtue of this order.
2. The petitioner has challenged a legal heirship certificate issued on
08.02.2024 pursuant to the demise of A.R.Sivaraman, S/o Ramachandran on 08.11.2023. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the brother of the said A.R.Sivaraman, whose wife had pre-deceased the husband without leaving any legal heir or issues.
3. The impugned legal heirship certificate contains the names of Vishnupriya S, as daughter of the decased, Vijaya, Ramachandran and Gomathi, being wife, father and mother of the deceased, who have pre- deceased him. According to the petitioner, the said Vishnupriya, arrayed as R2, is the daughter of one Thiyagarajan and Lalitha, who are stated to be unrelated to the petitioner or deceased A.R.Sivaraman.
4. According to the petitioner, the bi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.