SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21234

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
M/S.LG ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

R. MAHADEVAN, J.

For the sake of clarity, the sub headings given in this order are tabulated below:

SL. NO. DESCRIPTION PARAGRAPH NUMBERS
I INTRODUCTION 01-04
II PROVISION UNDER CHALLENGE 05-07
III LEGISLATIVE / JUDICIAL HISTORY RELATING TO WORKS CONTRACT 08-13
IV NATURE OF COMPOSITION SCHEME WITH REGARD TO WORKS CONTRACT 14-18
V LEGAL BACKGROUND OF THE SECTION 19-24
VI CONTENTIONS OF THE PETITIONERS 25-49
VII CONTENTIONS OF THE STATE 50-64
VIII CONTENTIONS IN REPLY 65-67
IX RELEVANT PROVISIONS UNDER VARIOUS STATUTES 68-75
X AUTHORITY TO LEGISLATE 76-79
XI OBJECT OF THE AMENDMENT 80-95
XII SIMILAR PROVISIONS IN OTHER ACTS OF OTHER STATES 96-106
XIII GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN FISCAL / ECONOMIC MATTERS 107-116
XIV ARTICLES 14 & 19(1)(g) 117-165
XV PART XIII OF THE CONSTITUTION 166-180
XVI CHALLENGE TO THE INVOCATION OF SECTION 27 181-195
XVII SEZ 196-201
XVIII DOCTRINE OF READING DOWN 202-208
XIX CHALLENGE AS TO RETROSPECTIVITY 209-217
XX CONCLUSION 218-219
I. INTRODUCTION

1. In these batches of writ petitions, some of which are filed praying to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring the amendment introduced by Act 21 of 200

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top