HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
M/S.LG ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
For the sake of clarity, the sub headings given in this order are tabulated below:
| SL. NO. | DESCRIPTION | PARAGRAPH NUMBERS |
| I | INTRODUCTION | 01-04 |
| II | PROVISION UNDER CHALLENGE | 05-07 |
| III | LEGISLATIVE / JUDICIAL HISTORY RELATING TO WORKS CONTRACT | 08-13 |
| IV | NATURE OF COMPOSITION SCHEME WITH REGARD TO WORKS CONTRACT | 14-18 |
| V | LEGAL BACKGROUND OF THE SECTION | 19-24 |
| VI | CONTENTIONS OF THE PETITIONERS | 25-49 |
| VII | CONTENTIONS OF THE STATE | 50-64 |
| VIII | CONTENTIONS IN REPLY | 65-67 |
| IX | RELEVANT PROVISIONS UNDER VARIOUS STATUTES | 68-75 |
| X | AUTHORITY TO LEGISLATE | 76-79 |
| XI | OBJECT OF THE AMENDMENT | 80-95 |
| XII | SIMILAR PROVISIONS IN OTHER ACTS OF OTHER STATES | 96-106 |
| XIII | GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN FISCAL / ECONOMIC MATTERS | 107-116 |
| XIV | ARTICLES 14 & 19(1)(g) | 117-165 |
| XV | PART XIII OF THE CONSTITUTION | 166-180 |
| XVI | CHALLENGE TO THE INVOCATION OF SECTION 27 | 181-195 |
| XVII | SEZ | 196-201 |
| XVIII DOCTRINE OF READING DOWN | 202-208 | |
| XIX | CHALLENGE AS TO RETROSPECTIVITY | 209-217 |
| XX | CONCLUSION | 218-219 |
1. In these batches of writ petitions, some of which are filed praying to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring the amendment introduced by Act 21 of 200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.