IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 10.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 33209 of 2024 T.Narayanan ...Petitioner Vs.
1.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, No.1, 1st cross street, New Kumaran Nagar, Sholinganallur, Chennai- 119.
2.The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Chennai South Joint - I 537, Fanepet, Nandanam, Chennai- 035 ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to update the computerized patta No. 8011 for the property situated in S.no. 657 /3A5, Pallikarnai Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai, measuring an extent of 5.04 acres in the official portal of the Tamil Nadu Government based on the proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.J7/
37749/ 2021 dated 31.12.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr. S.Karthikei Balan For Respondents : Mr. P.Harish Government Advocate.
O R D E R
The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:
“To direct the second respondent to update the computerized patta No. 8011 for the property situated in S.no. 657 /3A5, Pallikarnai Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai, measuring an extent of 5.04 acres in the official portal of the Tamil Nadu Government based on the proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.J7/ 37749/ 2021 dated
31.12.2021 ”
2. The petitioner states that the subject property originally belonged to his father. After his death, the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. All the revenue records, including patta stands in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner has also been issued with a computerized Patta No.8011, for the property.
3. The petitioner would submit that the Government of Tamil Nadu declared the adjacent lands as a Reserve Forest vide G.O.Ms.No.52 dated 09.04.2007. Based on the said GO, it is clear that the petitioner's property is not connected with the Reserve Forest Land. In the year 2011, when the petitioner attempted to pay property tax, he found that his property had been deleted from online records.
4. The petitioner approached the 2nd respondent and confirmed the legitimacy of his patta in No.8011 after verifying the manual patta No.252. The petitioner submits that his computerized patta No.8011 has not been uploaded and is being withheld for undisclosed reasons.
He has also filed a grievance letter to the Chief Minister's Grievance Cell, which was forwarded to the District Collector, then it was forwarded to the 2nd respondent. However, the 2nd respondent failed to respond to the same. Since there is no response, the petitioner is before this Court.
5. In the counter filed by the 1st respondent in paragraph No.10, the Tahsildar, who is the 1st respondent has made a following admissions.:
“The petitioner has stated that measuring an extent of 5.04 acres in Pallikaranai Village originally belongs to his father and had a patta in 1374 Fasli i.e., in the year 1964 is true, the accounts would have reflected those changes in 1986 Updated Registry Scheme.”
6. In the light of the above, what remains therefore is only the issue of computerised patta.
7. Therefore, the Writ Petition is allowed. The 1st respondent is directed to issue a computerised patta to the petitioner, within a period of 2 weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
10.01.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan To
1.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, No.1, 1st cross street, New Kumaran Nagar, Sholinganallur, Chennai- 119.
2.The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Chennai South Joint - I 537, Fanepet, Nandanam, Chennai- 035 P.T. ASHA, J, kan
10.01.2025
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.