The third defendant, who remained ex-parte in the trial Court, is the appellant before this Court.

2. The facts that have culmin ated in filing of this first appeal are briefly set out herein below. For the sake of easy understanding, the parties are referred to in the same ranking as before the trial Court.

3. The plaintiff had filed the suit O.S.No.121 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur at Poonamalle seeking the following reliefs:

(i) (a) that the sale deed dated 6.3.2006 under document No.1339/2006 registered with the SRO Avadi by the 2nd defendant in the capacity of the power agent of 1 st defendant in favour of the 4 th defendant by forging the signature of the 2nd defendant is null and void, (b) that the sale deed dated 1.11.2006 under document No.9304/2006 executed by the 4th defendant on the strength of created sale deed dated 6.3.2006 under document No.1339/2006 in favour of the 3rd defendant as null and void, and also praying.

(c) the vacant possession of A' schedule property to the plaintiff, (d) a permanent injunction against the 3rd defendant from in any manner alienating or encumbering the suit properties to any parties.

(e) a mand