SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20108

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
S.Nagajothi – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

The main grievance of the writ petitioner is that her period of maternity leave during probation period should be treated as duty period. Therefore, her seniority should be restored and seniority list published by the respondent should be quashed and rejection order passed by the respondent should be set aside.

2. The petitioner is originally appointed as Assistant (DRA) in the Tiruvallur District on 03.01.2023. In that cadre, she has completed the probation on 09.02.2016. After reorganisation of Chennai district, the petitioner was transferred to Chennai district, she joined the duty on 09.08.2018. The petitioner was promoted as Deputy Tahsildar in Chennai district from 07.01.2019 and she was in the period of probation for the period of two years. However, during the probation period, she availed the maternity leave for a period of nine months from 07.03.2020 to 01.12.2020 as per the G.O.Ms.No.154, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (FR-II) Department dated 05.12.2017. After the period of maternity leave, the petitioner's service has been regularised and her probation was declared in the cadre of Deputy Tahsildar on 06.01.2022. Hence, it is the grievance of the writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top