SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17987

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
DR.VINITH AGE 33 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


ORDER

Challenging the criminal proceedings in P.R.C.No.120 of 2023 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai, the present criminal original petition has been filed.

2.The prosecution case is that the defacto complainant Josebeen's son Santhosh Kumar came to the ARHT Global Clinic for hair transplantation on 15.05.2016, which is owned by the first accused Dr.Santhosh Kumar. Dr.Vinith the petitioner herein (second accused) treated the deceased Santhosh Kumar. After treatment, since his temperature had risen, he was taken to the nearby Guest Hospital, where the treatment was given for fever, thereafter, his mother the defacto complainant took him to C.M.C. Hospital, Vellore and taken for treatment on 16.05.2016, unfortunately, he died on 17.05.2016. In the postmortum report, the Doctor opined that the cause of death is “ Refractory shock and metabolic Acidosis Anaphylactic shock, Toxic Shock Syndrome, Septic Shock, Multiorgan Dysfunltion- Acute Renal Failure.” Further the allegation is, if he had not undergone hair transplantation treatment, he would not have died. The cause of death is, the hair transplantation done by untrained petitioner without any basic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top