SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19743

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
HARIKRISHNA.N.V – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent


ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the business of the petitioner carried in the name of “LATTE”.

2.The learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the respondent police do not have any authority to interfere with the business and close down the restaurant. The learned counsel submitted that the restaurant has been closed from 24.08.2023 and that the petitioner has been put to irreparable loss and hardship.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioner is running a restaurant with a separate smoking area for serving herbal flavored hookah. However, there was a complaint that the hookah also contained tobacco / nicotine and therefore, an inspection was made. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that if the petitioner continues to have the smoking area only for serving herbal flavored hookah, the respondent police will not interfere with the running of the business. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner must give a specific undertaking that they will not permit the smoking of hoo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top