HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
M.ILAMARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE PRESIDENT – Respondent
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. The petitioner's mother Sagunthala was granted natham patta in respect of the petition mentioned housing site. This was on 16.04.1992. The petitioner's mother settled the property in favour of the petitioner through an unregistered deed subsequently. Natham patta came to be issued in favour of the petitioner on 15.08.2018. The petitioner wanted to put up construction. He applied for building plan approval from the local body. The plan approval was granted by the respondent on 05.12.2018. The petitioner was to complete the construction within one year. The petitioner commenced the construction but could not complete the same. He therefore applied for extension of the plan period. The respondent granted further extension vide order dated 17.06.2020. The petitioner was continuing the construction. In the meanwhile, the complaint was received as if the assignment was made in favour of the petitioner's mother and that in breach of the terms and conditions set out therein, the property had been settled in favour of the petitioner. In this regard, notice was issued to the petitioner calling him for enquiry. The petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.