SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 4217

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
M.ILAMARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE PRESIDENT – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The petitioner's mother Sagunthala was granted natham patta in respect of the petition mentioned housing site. This was on 16.04.1992. The petitioner's mother settled the property in favour of the petitioner through an unregistered deed subsequently. Natham patta came to be issued in favour of the petitioner on 15.08.2018. The petitioner wanted to put up construction. He applied for building plan approval from the local body. The plan approval was granted by the respondent on 05.12.2018. The petitioner was to complete the construction within one year. The petitioner commenced the construction but could not complete the same. He therefore applied for extension of the plan period. The respondent granted further extension vide order dated 17.06.2020. The petitioner was continuing the construction. In the meanwhile, the complaint was received as if the assignment was made in favour of the petitioner's mother and that in breach of the terms and conditions set out therein, the property had been settled in favour of the petitioner. In this regard, notice was issued to the petitioner calling him for enquiry. The petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top