O R D E R

Challenge has been made to the concurrent finding of the Rent Controller Appellate authority directing eviction of the revision petitioner.

2. Brief background of the case is as follows : The respondents are the owners of the premises. The first respondent is the absolute owner of the property and the second respondent is her son and he was collecting the rent. The revision petitioner was inducted as a tenant in August 2011 by virtue of a rental agreement for a period of five years. Ever since the date of agreement, the revision petitioner was regular in payment of the monthly rents till March 2020. He is liable to pay a sum of Rs.3 lakhs towards rental arrears. That apart, the revision petitioner has unauhorizedly encroached into the additional space and installed a tea stalls, food counter etc.. Therefore, the first respondent has issued a notice to surrender possession.

3. Whereas, it is the case of the revision petitioner that the revision petitioner has entered into a