SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13988

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
A.Ponnukkalai – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent


ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed this Writ Petition seeking direction against the third Respondent to issue the 'Non Traceable Certificate' to the Petitioner relating to the missing Original Deed vide Document Nos.1444 of 2022 and 2047 of 2008 dated 26.08.2002 and 22.07.2008 respectively registered in the Sub Registrar Office, Ponnamaravathi.

2.It is his submission that the petitioner lost documents bearing Doc.Nos.

1444/2002 and 2047/2008 registered on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Ponnamaravathi, while returning from the Bank. The petitioner had given a complaint to the third respondent regarding missing of documents. Also, he had given a complaint through online on 06.01.2024. He had given a public advertisement in the local newspaper and in English version in Dinamani and Indian Express, Pudukkottai Edition on 10.01.2024. Therefore, he had filed this Petition seeking direction against the third Respondent to issue the 'Non Traceable Certificate' to the Petitioner

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), on instructions of the respondents 3 and 4, would submit that CSR.No.98 of 2024 had been registered by the fourth res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top