SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 428

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
R.K.SELVAMANI – Appellant
Versus
M.GAGAN BOTHRA – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

These petitions have been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.

1397 of 2017 on the file of the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, in which cognizance was taken for the offences under Sections 499 r/w 500 of IPC.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent filed a complaint on 17.05.2017 against the petitioners and other accused persons for prosecution of defamation. Allegedly, the petitioners gave an interview on 05.09.2016 to Puthiya Thalaimurai Channel, wherein certain accusations were made against the complainant, leading to damage to his reputation, the complainant being a financier by profession had charged exorbitant interest from his customers and many of them had committed suicide. He also submitted that certain allegations were made in the complaint stating that he has given the above interview to A1 news channel wherein he has stated about the complaint who used to indulge in all kinds of misdeeds to recover the loan amount from his customers. According to the complainant, the interview telecasted through A1 channel had resulted in total damage to the reputation of the complainant. He further submitted that

2\5 his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top