SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 50080

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
DURGA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPWERINDENT OF POLICE – Respondent


O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the Second Respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry.

2. The case of the petitioners are as follows:

(i) The first petitioner is pawn broker and is doing business under the name and style of "MRD Pawn Broker",after obaining necessary license under Section 4 (4) of Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Act and the second petitioner is her husband.

(ii) Whileso, the Second Respondent police 23.11.2021at 1.00 P.M. had visited the petitioner's shop and taken the first petitioner forcibly along with the Sister's son of the second petitioner to the police Station and demanded 56 sovereigns from them, to complete the investigation, which finally reduced to five sovereigns. The second petitioner thereafter contacted his advocate and got his wife and his sister's son released on 24.11.2021. Therefore, the first petitioner sent a representation to the first respondent through registered post on 25.11.2021, but no action has been taken till date. Hence, this petition.

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that they have been unnecessarily harassed by the Second Respondent under the guise of enquiry, calling them at odd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top