SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 38308

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
K.SRINIVASAN – Appellant
Versus
T.RANGANATHAN – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

This Criminal Appeal has been filed seeking to set aside the order passed in C.C.No.2457 of 2016 dated 08.03.2018 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-III, Saidapet, Chennai.

2. The appellant is the complainant in C.C.No.2457 of 2016 in which, the respondent is the accused. The complainant had filed the private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for the offence under Section 138 and 148 of the Amended Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-III, Saidapet, Chennai, and the learned Magistrate dismissed the same and acquitted the accused by order dated 08.03.2018.

3. Challenging the same, the complainant filed appeal before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in Crl.A.No.176 of 2018 and the same was made over to learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. The said appeal was allowed and the accused was convicted. Challenging the same, the accused filed revision before this Court in Crl.RC.No.828 of 2019. As per the decision of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in the case of K.Rajalingam Vs.Suganthalakshmi, the appeal against the acquittal will not l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top