O R D E R

A perusal of the records show that the respondents / defendants in O.S.No.295 of 2010 had been served and in the cause list, their names and addresses are also printed. This was the position even on 14.02.2022, and this Court had given one further opportunity and gave a direction to the Registry to examine, whether any counsel had entered appearnce on behalf of the respondents and the matter was adjourned. Again, there is no response. There is a counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, who is the plaintiff in the said suit.

2.The suit O.S.No.295 of 2010 had been filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful posession of the plaintiff and from damaging or dismantling the earthen crops bunds in the boundary of the suit property. The suit property is a vacant land stretching to several survey numbers. In the said suit, the respondent / 1st defendant had filed a written statement. It is seen that the respondents / defendants filed I.A.No.30 of 2012, seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed and warrant also issued. The Advocate Commissioner filed a report along with rough ske