SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 417

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
Tamilnadu Spinning Mills – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Generation and – Respondent


O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted the copy of the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi in Appal No.197 of 2019 dated 02.08.2021, wherein the issues raised in the present writ petition were considered and the same reads as under:-

“111. The Appellant, NSEFI, is mainly aggrieved with the decision of the Respondent Commission in the impugned order dated 25.03.2019 to disallow deemed generation charges for the capacity which could not be generated and supplied due to backing down instructions issued by Respondent No 3 (TNSLDC). The Appellant Association has alleged that its members were directed to back down generation of their solar plants by way of arbitrary, unjustified and unlawful verbal and email instructions issued by the State Load Despatch Centre. It is the contention of the Appellant that the backed down energy must be considered as deemed generation and ought to have been compensated with deemed generation charges as per the tariff applicable under PPA by the Respondent Commission. In this regard, the Respondent Commission, in the impugned order, has decided as under:-

“10.17. While perusing the rejoinder filed by the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top