SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 8688

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
RAGHURAMAN PILLAI DIED – Appellant
Versus
SOODAMANI AMMAL (DIED) – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

All the three matters have been directed to be listed as per roster and since the Contempt Petition has been filed in S.A.No. 1067 of 2003, the three matters have been listed before this Court.

2. The Second Appeal and the First Appeal emanate from a suit for partition in O.S.No. 169 of 1977 which was on the file of Sub Court, Vellore. The said suit for partition had been filed by Soodamani Ammal against Raghurama Pillai and Pattabiraman, who are her brothers. As on date, the plaintiff Soodamani Ammal, the first defendant Raghurama Pillai and the second defendant Pattabiraman have all died but their legal representatives are still at lis over the issues which have been raised in the Original Suit, and more particularly in the preliminary decree passed and also in the final decree passed.

3. It must be mentioned that the said suit progressed and by consent of all the parties, a preliminary decree was passed on 11.03.1980 wherein the properties which were the subject matter of the partition suit were divided. The share of each of the parties determined at 1/3rd each. Questioning the said preliminary decree, A.S.No. 60 of 2001 was filed before the District Court at Vellor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top