O R D E R

The revision is filed challenging certain docket order passed in unnumbered G.W.O.P.Sr.No.OP/424/2021.

2. The revision petitioner is the father of the Children and respondent is the mother. He had filed guardian ward petition to declare that the petitioner/father of the Children as the permanent guardian of the two minor children.

3. This was returned on filing on the following grounds:

(a)How is prayer (a) maintainable. Petitioner is a natural guardian of the minor to be stated as per u/s 6 of the HMG Act 1956.

(b) How this petition is maintainable on the point of territorial jurisdiction {u/s 9 of the GW Act 1890}

4. This is challenged in this revision on the ground of return.

5. This Court is literally shocked to read ground Nos.1 and 3 for the grounds of return. Ground No.1 extracted above indicates that the Court insists on a statement in the pleadings of the Revision petitioner that he is the natural guardian of the minor children under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, and ground No.3 relates to territorial jurisdiction of the minors in maintaining the Guardian and Wards original petition before the Court in Vellore in terms of Section 9 of the