HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, J
M/S.SHANKER IMPEX – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) (FAC) – Respondent
Order
Heard M/s.Ramya Krishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader (T) for the respondent No.1
2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order passed by the first Respondent herein dated 19.04.2023.
3. At the threshold, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is no longer res integra, as it has already been decided by this Court in a batch of Writ Petitions, viz., in W.P.No.25081 of 2024, etc dated 17.10.2024. Therefore, the learned counsel prays that the benefit of the said order dated 17.10.2024, may extended to the petitioner herein as well.
4. The learned Additional Government Pleader (T) for respondent No.1 also fairly conceded that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is covered by the decision relied on by the petitioner.
5. Considering the fact that the legal issue involved in this Writ Petition has already been dealt with by this Court in a batch of Writ Petitions, viz., in W.P.No.25081 of 2024, etc dated 17.10.2024, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition on the same lines. For better appreciation, the operative
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.