HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
T.Karunanithi – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer, The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Tahsildar, Suyam Prakash – Respondent
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 30.12.2020 and for a consequential direction to the 3rd respondent to restore the patta in the name of the petitioner with respect to the subject property.
2. The case of the petitioner is that his father is the owner of the subject property. He executed a will dated 30.12.2002 and the property was bequeathed in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner became the owner of the property, after the demise of his father and patta was issued in favour of the petitioner in patta No.6422/2010. The 4th respondent filed a petition before the 3rd respondent seeking cancellation of patta that stood in the name of the petitioner. The 3rd respondent through proceedings dated 14.12.2017, cancelled the patta standing in the name of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent and the said appeal was also rejected by order dated 27.06.2018. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed a revision before the 1st respondent and the 1st respondent, through the impugned proceedings dated 30.12.2002, rejected the revision. Aggrieved by the same, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.