SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3268

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
R.Vijayakumar, J
Lakshmiammal – Appellant
Versus
Murugesan – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.V.George Raja

ORDER

The instant civil revision petition has been filed by the third plaintiff in O.S.No.294 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Valliyoor challenging the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021 wherein the prayer of the revision petitioner to condone the delay in representation has been dismissed.

2.The revision petitioner herein along with two others had filed the above said suit for the relief of partition and separate possession. When the suit was posted on 01.07.2016, due to non-appearance of the plaintiffs, it was dismissed for default. The plaintiffs have filed I.A.No.277 of 2016 within the time to restore the suit. When the said application was pending, the sixth defendant had passed away and applications were filed to condone the delay, set aside the abatement and to implead the legal heirs of the deceased sixth defendant. These applications were filed with a delay. The applications were returned for rectifying the defects. They were not represented in time. After a delay of 1720 days, the application was re-presented along with I.A.No.1 of 2021 to condone the delay in representation.

3.A perusal of the affidavit in I.A.No.1 of 2021 reveals that the said af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top