HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN, J
M.SEKAR – Appellant
Versus
K.PRABHAVATHY – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner/husband has filed the present revision petition as against the order passed in the maintenance case filed by the respondent/wife in M.C.No.485 of 2014 on the file of the Vth Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, by order dated 17.08.2022, in and by which the said maintenance case was partly allowed, directing the husband to pay Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent/wife from the date of the maintenance petition, and the said amount was directed to be paid before 5th day of every English calendar month.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/husband stated that the husband is only getting a meagre pension of just Rs.21,000/- per month and this aspect was duly considered by the Family Court while ordering maintenance. Further, the petitioner/husband has not received the terminal benefits till date and he was working in a School and subsequently, the husband had resigned the job.
3. Further, it is contended that although the respondent/wife is able to maintain herself without any maintenance from the revision petitioner/husband and that she is a trouble-maker and she saw to it that the petitioner/husband is not getting the retirement benefits. Ever afte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.