Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J
Dhinakarapandi @ K.Dhinakaran – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the fir and charges against the petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. description of the compromise reached between the parties. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on the legal power to quash based on the supreme court precedents. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. outcome of the petition allowing the quashing of the fir. (Para 9) |
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.95 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.05.2024, the defacto complainant after bathing in from one Jeyaraj's agricultural, the petitioners are said to have abused and assaulted the defacto complainant with steal. Hence, this case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the second respondent has lodged a complaint before the first respondent Police and on that basis, F.I.R. came to be registered in Crime No.95 of 2024, dated 03.05.2024 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323 and 506(ii) of IPC.
4. The case is still under the investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among thems
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
