Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
The Chairman and Managing Director, Indian Overseas Bank – Appellant
Versus
C.Balraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought to quash order and withdraw gratuity. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of the settlement and compensation agreement. (Para 2) |
| 3. final ruling to close the writ petition. (Para 3) |
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent's impugned order No.39/6/PGA/2020-B1 dated 18.04.2022 and quash the same and consequently allow the appeal preferred by the petitioner before the second respondent in Gratuity Appeal No.6/2020.
2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the matter was settled before the Mediation Centre on 28.01.2025. The terms of settlement as per the compromise memo enclosed along with the Mediation Report dated 28.01.2025 reads as follows:
“1. The petitioner is represented by Mr.Niraj Kumar, Chief Manager, Human resources Department, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai and he is duly authorized to execute the above compromise memo.
2. Both the petitioner and the 1st Respondent arrived at an amicable settlement and the 1st Respondent, Mr.C.Balraj had agreed to receive the amount of Rs.13,42,739/- which is deposited before t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
