SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 8613

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
e.kadhar basha – Appellant
Versus
the inspector – Respondent
Crl.O.P.No.5321 of 2025



Advocates:
Mr.M.G.Martinmanivannan, Mr.N.P.Kumar Special Public Prosecutor for NCB

The court upheld the legality of the remand order, confirming that the arrest and remand procedures complied with statutory and constitutional requirements.

Headnote:(A) NDPS Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)

(C), 27A, 28, 29 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 50, 57 - Constitution of India - Article 22(1), 22(5) - Petition challenging remand order for possession of Ganja - Petitioners alleged illegal custody and torture, claiming violation of constitutional rights - Court found no breach of procedures regarding arrest and remand, confirming compliance with statutory requirements. (Paras 3-14)

(B) Constitutional Rights - Right to be informed of grounds of arrest and to communicate with relatives - Non-compliance renders detention illegal - Court emphasized the importance of informing relatives to secure legal assistance. (Paras 6-7)

(C) Remand Procedures - Court upheld the remand order, stating that the respondent followed necessary legal protocols during arrest and remand. (Paras 12-13)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were arrested for possessing 432.700 kgs of Ganja and claimed they were tortured and not informed of their arrest. They challenged the remand order after two years, alleging violations of their rights.

Findings of Court:
The court found no illegality in the remand order and confirmed that the respondent followed legal procedures.

Issues: Whether the arrest and remand procedures were violated, and if the petitioners' rights under Article 22 were breached.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the respondent adhered to the legal requirements for arrest and remand, dismissing the petitioners' claims of illegal detention.

Result: Criminal Original Petition dismissed.

ORDER

This petition has been filed challenging the order of remand passed as against the petitioner by the Judicial Magistrate-II, Ponneri in R.R.No.23 of 2023, dated 27.07.2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials placed on record.

3. The petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2 in R.R.No.23 of 2023 under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(C), 27A, 28 and 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 on the file of the respondent, alleging that the petitioners were in possession and transported Ganja weighing about 432.700 kgs and intercepted a vehicle which was driven by the first accused bearing Registration No.TN 31 BD 6347 at Karanodai Toll Plaza, Chennai on 24/25.07.2023. However, they were remanded to judicial custody on 27.07.2023. In the meanwhile, they were kept in the illegal custody and they were tortured by physically and mentally for almost three days.

4. After a period of three days, they were produced for remand on 27.07.2023. Immediately, after their arrest, they were not produced before the nearest Magistrate. That apart, their arrest were not intimated to any of the petitioners' friends, relatives or family members. The respondent violated the mandatory procedure as contemplated under Section 167 Cr.P.C . Further, the respondent failed to produce the petitioners within 24 hours from the time of arrest/detention as contemplated under Section 57 of Cr.P.C or not transmitted to the nearest Judicial Magistrate. Therefore, it is a clear violation of Article 22 of Constitution of India .

5. In support of contention, the learned counsel for the petitioners relied upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (Crl.)No.13320 of 2024, in the case of Vihaan Kumar Vs State of Haryana and another dated 07.02.2025, in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that as per clause 1 of Article 22 of Constitution of India that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. Further as per Section 50 of Cr.P.C , a person arrested to be informed of grounds of arrest and of right to bail.

6. Article 22(5) of Constitution of India is regarding communication of the grounds of arrest or detention in writing to the relatives, family members or friends of the accused. Therefore, Article 22(1) and 22(5) of cannot be breached under any situation. Non compliance of the constitutional requirements and statutory mandate would lead to the custody or the detention being rendered illegal, as the case may be.

7. It was further held that the purpose of inserting Section 50A of Cr.P.C , making it obligatory on the person making arrest to inform about the arrest to the friends, relatives or persons nominated by the arrested person, is to ensure that they would able to take immediate and prompt actions to secure the release of the arrested person as permissible under the law. The arrested person, because of his detention, may not have immediate and easy access to the legal process for securing his release, which would otherwise be available to the friends, relatives and such nominated persons by way of engaging lawyers, briefing them to secure release of the detained person on bail at the earliest. Therefore, communicating the grounds of detenue and in addition to his relatives as mentioned above is not merely a formality but to enable the detained person to know the reasons for his arrest but also to provide the necessary opportunity to him through his relatives, friends or nominated persons.

8. A perusal of records revealed that on secret information, the respondent intercepted the vehicle which was driven by the first accused along with second accused at about 18.10 hrs, on 24.07.2023 and the accused were questioned about the transportation of ganja. The accused replied that they were carrying 220 ganja packets packed in 11 gunny bags concealed in the truck back side and covered with green colour plastic tarpaulin. Those packets have to be d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top