SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 9618

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Mrs. Justice J. Nisha Banu, Mrs. Justice S. Srimathy, JJ
directorate of medical educa – Appellant
Versus
dr. m.k. bharathi – Respondent
W.A(MD)No.1366 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD)No.10607 of 2024



Advocates:
Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader, Mr.C.Deepak

Seniority in public service should be calculated from the date of transfer order, not the date of joining, unless there is willful delay by the employee.

Headnote:(A) Government Order (2D) No.131, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 20.11.2007 - Seniority calculation - Writ petition filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to revise seniority list based on transfer order date - The writ petitioner was transferred on 16.08.2023 but relieved on 25.10.2023, leading to incorrect seniority calculation based on joining date. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Seniority Rights - The court emphasized that the delay in relieving the writ petitioner was not her fault, and thus, her seniority should be calculated from the date of transfer order. (Paras 7-8)

(C) Government Order Amendment - The subsequent G.O. clarified that seniority should be calculated from the date of transfer order unless there is willful delay by the medical officer. (Paras 8-9)

Facts of the case:
The writ petitioner challenged the seniority list that incorrectly considered her joining date instead of the transfer order date, which deprived her of participating in transfer counselling.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the delay in relieving the writ petitioner was not her fault and directed that her seniority be calculated from the transfer order date.

Issues: The main issues were whether the seniority should be calculated from the transfer order date or the joining date and the implications of the government order amendments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the seniority must be calculated from the transfer order date, as the delay in relieving was not the fault of the writ petitioner.

Result: Writ appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.SRIMATHY, J.

The present writ appeal is filed by the respondents against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.13792 of 2024, dated 27.06.2024.

2. The writ petition was filed inter alia praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent therein to revise the seniority list in Pharmocology Department based on the date of transfer posting order before conducting the re-counselling which arises due to the vacancy caused by transfer counselling vide circular Transfer Counselling / By E-Mail / Ref.No. 000033/E3/1/2024, dated 14.06.2024.

3. The 1st respondent herein is the writ petitioner. The writ petitioner was earlier transferred vide order dated 16.08.2023 to Virudhunagar Government College. At that point of time the writ petitioner was working in Nilgiris Medical College and she was relieved only on 25.10.2023 and then she joined in the transferred place of Virudhunagar on 26.10.2023. In the next transfer counselling, which was released on 19.06.2024 the petitioner’s name has been included in incorrect seniority by taking the date of joining instead of date of transfer order.

4. The contention of the writ petitioner is that the transfer order was issued on 16.08.2023 but she was belatedly relieved on 25.10.2023 by the Nilgiris Medical College and the very next day the writ petitioner joined the transferred place without availing the joining leave. Hence the claim of the petitioner she ought to have been kept in seniority list by taking the date of transfer order. But when the 1st respondent issued the circular, dated 14.06.2024, fixing the date of counselling for Pharmacology on 19.06.2024, a seniority list was released based on the date of joining in the last working station. If the date of transfer dated 16.08.2023 is taken for consideration, then the writ petitioner is eligible to be placed in the seniority list and would have obtained the transfer order. But the respondents have taken 26.10.2023, the date of joining and have calculated the seniority, thereby, deprived the writ petitioner from participating in the transfer counselling based on circular, dated 14.06.2024. Hence, the writ petition was filed.

5. After considering the writ petitioner's plea, the Writ Court has disposed of the writ petition and directed the 1st respondent therein to modify the transfer counselling seniority by including the writ petitioner's name. Aggrieved over the same the respondents in the writ petition had filed the present writ appeal.

6. The contention of the appellants is that G.O.(2D).No.131, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 20.11.2007, has given guidelines for conducting transfer counselling. In the said G.O., guidelines for determining the seniority list were also prescribed. Under clause 10.6, it states that actual period of duty in the present posting alone can be counted for preparing the seniority list. When the writ petitioner had joined the duty on 26.10.2023, then the writ petitioner is entitled to seniority from the date of joining the transferred post.

7. The clause 10.6 of the said G.O. is extracted hereunder:

“For counting station seniority, actual period of duty in the present posting alone will be counted, excluding period spent on leave like Earned Leave, Medical Leave, Extra ordinary leave, etc., and period of unauthorised absence.”

The said clause only speaks to exclude the leave period or unauthorised absence period alone. In the present case, the writ petitioner was granted relieving order which is a belated one. Even according to the appellants, the service of the writ petitioner was necessary, hence the appellant had retained the writ petitioner in Nilgiris and the said decision was taken in the interest of public. But such decision cannot affect the writ petitioner's valuable right of seniority. Further, it is not the mistake of the writ petitioner. Infact the writ petitioner was ready and willing to serve in the transferred post at Virdhunagar. It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top