Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, A.D.MARIA CLETE, JJ
Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
The DBS Bank India Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge tribunal's order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delay in appeal questioned under act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court affirms tribunal's findings. (Para 7) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
************
[Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.]
By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
2.This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.11.2024 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, in I.A.No.31 of 2022 of AIR No.236 of 2021.
3.The respondent Bank had filed an original application in O.A.No.390 of 2013 against the petitioners herein for recovery of a sum of Rs.18,73,807.75/- with accrued interest. The petitioners were set ex-parte on 21.11.2014 and final orders were passed on 15.12.2017 by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai. Thereafter, an application in I.A.No.1929 of 2018, was filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 199 days in filing the petition to set aside ex-parte order. By an order dated 19.03.2020, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, had dismissed the petition in I.A.No.1929 of 2018, by holding that there were no convinc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
