SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13212

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY
M/S. HARI AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ( – Respondent


ORDER

The Writ Petition is filed to quash the impugned order dated 28.01.2022, as the equipment will not come under Motor Vehicle and hence it is unlawful and without jurisdiction.

2. The petitioner is an assessee on the file of the respondent under provisions of Tamil Nadu Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act 1990 (hereinafter called as Act). The petitioner is a dealer engaged in “container handling activities” by using equipment and for that, he had purchased “Reach Stacker” from M/s.Indital Construction Machinery Limited, Bangalore vide Invoice No.218 dated 24.08.2005. The contention of the petitioner is that the Reach Stacker is being used for arranging and lifting heavy containers in “confined premises” but absolutely not usable for transporting containers on public roads. For the assessment year 2005-2006, the respondent has issued the pre-assessment notice dated 22.12.2005, proposing to make an assessment under the Act for turnover of Rs.1,17,52,000/- at 20% along with penalty being twice the amount of tax under Section 15 of the Act. Aggrieved the assessment order, the petitioner had filed W.P.(MD)No.7740 of 2006 and the same was dismissed on 10.11.2020, against whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top