ORDER

The case of the prosecution is that as per the complaint given by the second respondent, the grand father of the defacto complainant has purchased the property and the same was grabbed by the 1st accused/Vanjunavalli, she claimed that she is the foster daughter of one Muthukrishna Iyer. Originally, the propperty was belongs to Muthukrishna Iyer and he has sold the propertis to his brother Gopala Iyer and others. After the death of Muthukrishna Iyer, the 1st accused claimed that she is the legal heir and obtained a certificate and fabricated the will and grabbed property belongs to the defacto complainant's grand father. Further, the 1st accused had fraudulently created the Will and grabbed the property. Thus, the petitioner along with other accused persons have colluded together to grab the property belongs to the defacto complainant's grand father. Hence, the complaint.

2. The petitioner herein is the 4th accused in Crime No366 of 2011.

Based on the complaint given by the second respondent, the FIR was registered against the petitioner and others for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w 120(B) of IPC. Subsequently, the 1st respondent police has c