HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
J.NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT REGISTRAR – Respondent
O R D E R
Challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 15.07.2024 bearing No.5437/2024, this writ petition has been filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials available on record.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had purchased the subject property from the Honk Kong Indians and Exnora Public Charitable Trust on 02.05.2024; subsequently, he sold the said property to one Krishnan vide Sale Deed dated 10.07.2024 and when the same was presented for registration, the 2nd respondent refused to register the same, citing the reason that the
3rd respondent has given a protest petition. Hence, the present writ petition.
4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the
3rd respondent has given a protest petition stating that the said Trust had already entered into an agreement to sell the same subject property to him on 30.01.2023 and however, sale deed could not be executed as the Trust did not obtain prior permission for the sale. Hence, the learned counsel submits that the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent, cannot be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.