SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20696

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
J.NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT REGISTRAR – Respondent


O R D E R

Challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 15.07.2024 bearing No.5437/2024, this writ petition has been filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials available on record.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had purchased the subject property from the Honk Kong Indians and Exnora Public Charitable Trust on 02.05.2024; subsequently, he sold the said property to one Krishnan vide Sale Deed dated 10.07.2024 and when the same was presented for registration, the 2nd respondent refused to register the same, citing the reason that the

3rd respondent has given a protest petition. Hence, the present writ petition.

4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the

3rd respondent has given a protest petition stating that the said Trust had already entered into an agreement to sell the same subject property to him on 30.01.2023 and however, sale deed could not be executed as the Trust did not obtain prior permission for the sale. Hence, the learned counsel submits that the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent, cannot be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top