SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 26461

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mrs Justice R. KALAIMATHI
RANGASAMY – Appellant
Versus
NATESAN (DIED) – Respondent


O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiff against the order dated 30.09.2022 passed in I.A. No. 6 of 2022 in O.S. No. 381 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode.

2. Heard Mr. B.Jawahar, learned counsel for the petitioner / plaintiff and Mr. N.Manoharan, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The plaint was laid by the present revision petitioner against the respondents for the relief of declaration of title and for consequential permanent injunction not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. It is also relevant to extract the details of description of property mentioned in the plaint which is set out hereunder:-

"ehkf;fy; hpo. jpUrb; r'n; fhL rgh; po kw;Wk; tll; k;.

eyy; pghisak; fpuhkk;. gd'F; sp g"[ i; r kw;Wk; njhll; k; gj[ pa gy[ vz;/50-1B D.H.2.77.50 jP/U:/15/45 ,jpy; bjdg; [wk; g[/V/3/47/ (,jpy; gpujpthjpfs; tifawh rK:fk; ePjpkd;w O.S. No. 143/1999 jPhg; g; hizapy; fzl; bjd;tly jl;rj;jpwF; Fej; fkpyy; hky); "

4. It appears that where the suit was posted for cross examination of D.W.1, above said petition under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC was filed by stating that certain details connected

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top