SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19272

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.S. SUNDAR
KASINATHAN – Appellant
Versus
PANCHALAI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The Plaintiff in O.S.No.71 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chindambaram, is the appellant in the Second Appeal.

2. The Plaintiff/Appellant filed the suit in O.S.No.71 of 2009 for declaration of title to the suit property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property, measuring to an extent of 0.8 cents out of 33 cents in S.No.310/3 in Killai Village.

3. The case of the appellant is that the suit property was purchased by the plaintiff represented by his guardian, namely mother by a registered sale deed dated 07.09.1963. When the property was purchased, the plaintiff was a minor. In the plaint, it is stated that the property was purchased from one Veerasamy and the property was in the enjoyment of his mother when he was minor. In the plaint, the plaintiff has not indicated the nature and the character of the property except stating that plaintiff is doing cultivation.

4. In the written statement, it is stated that the suit property was the property of one Veerasamy and that the said Veerasamy had two wives. First wife is one Alamelu ammal and she had two sons namel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top