SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12909

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
SYRMA TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES SWEDE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M .M.SUNDRESH, J .

This original side appeal has been preferred by the defendant in the suit filed for recovery of money on the failure of the appellant to make the supply in terms of the purchase orders. On an application in A.No.7113 of 2018 in C.S.No.851 of 2015 filed by the plaintiff/respondent seeking a summary judgment, the Commercial Division of this Court granted a decree in part.

2. Before going into the facts governing, it is imperative to appreciate the scope and ambit of Order XIII-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which deals with summary judgment in the light of the object behind the enactment.

3.Recommendations of the Law Commission:-

3.1.Two recommendations have been made by the Law Commission through its 188th and 253rd Reports. As per the 188th Report, the need to introduce the Commercial Courts, was expressed, acknowledging the then prevailing view that Indian Courts were slow to get off the block and proceed at a reasonable gallop. Keeping in mind the functioning of the Courts Abroad, U.S., and U.K., in particular, the Law Commission has expressed its views.

“With such rapid increase in commerce and trade, commercial disputes involving high stakes are lik

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top