SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17889

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice C. SARAVANAN
M.BABU – Appellant
Versus
L.P.NEELIMA – Respondent


O R D E R

The claimant is aggrieved by the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 21.03.2007. By the impugned Judgment and Decree, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.87,000/- as against the claim of Rs.5,00,000/-.

2. In this Appeal, the appellant has restricted the appeal for another sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. It appears that this case was earlier argued. The learned counsel for the Appellant was asked to give a calculation based on the multiplier at 50% and 40% disability. At 50% disability, the appellant is entitled to a sum of Rs.5,56,700/- as compensation and Rs.4,80,000/- at 40% disability.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondent.

4. It is the case of the claimant that he met with an accident while riding a motor vehicle which was hit by the car belonging to the first respondent insured with the 2nd respondent Insurance Company. It is submitted that the Tribunal has awarded a meager sum of Rs.87,000/- as compensation under the followings heads:-

Award of the Tribunal

Income fixed by the Tribunal Monthly Income not fixed by the Tribunal
Age of Injured 35 years
Disability Rs.50,000/-
Pain and Sufferings Rs.10,000/-
Transport to Hospital Rs.1,000/-
Ext

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top