ORDER

It is a case of civil dispute has been given the criminal colour by the de facto complainant merely on the premise that the over writing in the sale agreement entered between the accused persons. The petitioner herein is the purchaser for value and he is arrayed as one of the accused in C.C.No.210 of 2018 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramathyvelur.

2. To put it precisely, the property held by A1 [Mohanraj]

A2 [Leelavathi] A3 [Manickandavel], A4 [Vanajavadivu] and A5 [Rajavadivel] agreed to be sold by them to the petitioner herein/S.K.Sundarrajan vide sale agreement deed dated 26.05.2008 which is now being questioned by the de facto complainant that this document is an anti dated document to defeat his lawful right over the property which he purchased from the common vendor on 13.10.2011.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that his vendor after entering into an agreement with him on 26.05.2008, later duly executed the sale deed on 13.10.2011. While so, to defeat his lawful title over the property in collusion with the petitioner herein had created the ante dated agreement and had filed a frivolous petitions before the civil Court seeking in