SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 23036

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.S. SUNDAR
ANBALAGAN – Appellant
Versus
A. TAKSHINAMOORTHY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1) The appellants are the defendants in the suit in OS.No.131 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vannur Taluk, Thindivanam.

2) The respondent in this appeal as plaintiff, filed the suit in OS.No.131/2008 for declaration of his title to the suit 'A' Schedule property and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants/appellants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit properties.

3) The suit 'A' schedule property is described as an extent of 12 cents in Survey Number 181/22 in Periya Kozhuvari village in Vannur Taluk. The extent of 6 cents out of total extent of 12 cents in survey Number 181/22 is described as suit 'B' schedule property.

4) The case of the respondent herein, in the plaint is that the suit property is the absolute property of the plaintiff. It is his case that one Muthammal purchased the suit property by a registered sale Deed dated 11.12.1944 from one Kamatchiammal and the said Muthammal later executed a registered settlement Deed in favour of the plaintiff on 29.06.1966, when he was a minor. It is his further case that his father was in the management of the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top