SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 29835

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
S.JACOB SELVIN JEBARAJ – Appellant
Versus
P.JEBASELAN DANIAL RAJ – Respondent


C O M M O N O R D E R

These Civil Revision Petitions are filed as against the fair and decreetal orders passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority/ Subordinate Judge, Thoothukudi in I.A.Nos.1 & 1 of 2019 in R.C.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2017, dated 08.04.2021.

2.The respondent herein/the tenant has filed R.C.O.P.No.37 of

2013 before the Rent Controller/Principal District Munsif Court, Tuticorin to deposit the rent amount. The petitioners/the Landlords herein filed R.C.O.P.No.18 of 2015 before the same Court, for eviction on the ground of willful default and on owners occupation. The petition filed by the tenant in R.C.O.P.No.37 of 2013 was allowed by the learned Rent Controller and the petition filed by the landlords in R.C.O.P.No.18 of 2015 was dismissed. Aggrieved over the same, the landlords preferred appeals in R.C.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2017 before the first Appellate Authority and the same is pending. Pending the appeals, the counsel for the landlords noted down that the door number of the suit schedule property has been mentioned as 95H/25A instead of 97H/2. Hence, they filed interlocutory applications in I.A.Nos.1 & 1 of 2019 in R.C.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2017, to rectify the error with the suppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top